Range of radiocarbon dating
Range of radiocarbon dating - colin grafton dating
Other factors and basic assumptions must also be considered.
This just goes to show that just because independent estimates of age seem to agree with each other doesn't mean that they're correct - despite the fact that this particular argument is the very same one used to support the validity of radiometric dating today.Chamberlain (1899) pointed out that Kelvin's calculations were only as good as the assumptions on which they were based."The fascinating impressiveness of rigorous mathematical analyses, with its atmosphere of precision and elegance, should not blind us to the defects of the premises that condition the whole process.Without this knowledge, he argued that, "As for the future, we may say, with equal certainty, that inhabitants of the Earth cannot continue to enjoy the light and heat essential to their life, for many million years longer, unless sources now unknown to us are prepared in the great storehouse of creation."The same is true of the basis of Kelvin's estimate of the age of the Earth.It was based on the idea that no significant source of novel heat energy was affecting the Earth.If you are reading this, you are probably familiar with the two-nuclide diagram commonly used to represent paired Be-10 and Al-26 data: This example is from a review article by Darryl Granger from 2006 (in GSA Special Paper 415) that gives a good description of what the diagram is and how it is supposed to work.
Basically, the diagram shows Be-10 concentration on the x-axis and the Al-26/Be-10 ratio on the y-axis, although commonly both quantities are shown in normalized units computed by dividing observed concentrations by the respective production rates at the sample site – this normalization allows plotting data from different sites, with different production rates, on the same axis.This is represented by a trajectory that goes down and to the left, as shown above in the Granger example.So samples that are “below the banana” have experienced both a period of exposure and a period of burial.The basic concept here is that if your sample stays at the surface and experiences steady exposure with or without erosion, nuclide concentrations are confined to the “simple exposure region” highlighted with dark lines in the above figure.In certain manifestations of this diagram (primarily when plotted with a log x-axis and a linear y-axis), the simple exposure region vaguely resembles a banana, for example: This resemblance, perhaps unfortunately, has resulted in the common use of the term “banana diagram.” Then the important aspect of this diagram is that if the sample gets buried after a period of surface exposure, both Al-26 and Be-10 concentrations decrease due to radioactive decay, and Al-26 decreases faster than Be-10.He believed this even though he did admit that some heat might be generated by the tidal forces or by chemical action.